Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Resolved
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
1.8.0
-
None
-
None
Description
At least, as far as I can see it doesn't support it. We're looking at migrating to 1.8, and these additional types are a big motivator.
I would advocate adding each one of the new logical types as supported primitive types in the IDL... if that sounds good to you, I can probably look into doing it tomorrow.