Details
-
Task
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
1.26.0
Description
Issue pointed out by zabetak during the review of CALCITE-4621.
Currently, SemiJoinRule (both CoreRules.JOIN_TO_SEMI_JOIN and CoreRules.PROJECT_TO_SEMI_JOIN) matches INNER, LEFT and SEMI join. This last join type seems a bit bizarre (why matching a SEMI join if the purpose of this rule is precisely generating one?).
It seems that SEMI was introduced in the rule by the "big join design refactoring" (see CALCITE-2969 and 4809393).
The purpose of this ticket is to confirm whether or not processing SEMI in SemiJoinRule makes sense (and if not, remove it).
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
CALCITE-4621 SemiJoinRule throws AssertionError on ANTI join
- Closed
-
CALCITE-2969 Improve design of join-like relational expressions
- Closed
- links to