Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
3.11.2
-
None
-
Unknown
Description
Hi,
using aggregate with a JdbcAggregationRepository, we are encountering a race condition that may leave a completed exchange in completed table even after that completed exchange has been sent. Unfortunately, that leads to duplicates since recovery task will eventually try and recover it.
Normally, when the exchange completes, it is deleted from repo exchange table and inserted into repo completed exchange table. Then exchange is sent and deleted from repo completed exchange table.
But, due to the fact those two actions are run by different threads (and in different transactions) that order may vary.
Here is a normal sequence :
AggregateProcessor.doProcess
doAggregation
doAggregationComplete
onCompletion
JdbcAggregationRepository.remove : => INSERT ... INTO _completed
onSubmitCompletion
AggregateOnCompletion.onComplete (via executorService)
JdbcAggregationRepository.confirm : => DELETE FROM _completed
With the use of executorService, confirm is run by another thread and may commit before remove commits. Eventually, when that occurs, one can check that DELETE statement returns 0 (number of deleted rows) instead of 1.
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- links to