Design documents accept invalid views

Design documents seem to accept invalid views.

For example:

$ http PUT $DB1/db2/_design/des1 views:='{ "v1" : "function(d){emit(d._id,d);}" }'
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
{
    "id": "_design/des1",
    "ok": true,
    "rev": "1-04701f13eb827265c442d219bd995e91"
}

Going by the documentation for design documents: http://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/api/ddoc/common.html#put--db-_design-ddoc , a view should be an object that has a map (a string) and an optional reduce (string).

Interestingly some validation is performed to check that views field itself is an object. For example:

$ http PUT $DB1/db2/_design/des1 views:='"x"'
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
{
    "error": "invalid_design_doc",
    "reason": "`views` parameter must be an object."
}

Also there is a deeper level validation of map functions:

$  http PUT $DB1/db2/_design/des1 views:='{ "m":{"map":""} }'
{
    "error": "not_found",
    "reason": "missing function"
}

If there is interest, I have a patch that, if provided: views, filters, lists, show, updates, options are objects. rewrites are arrays, validate_doc_update and language are strings.

Then if views is provided, each view is an object. It must have a map function (a string) and an optional reduce function (also a string).

Here is an example how it works:

$ http PUT $DB1/db2/_design/des1 views:='{ "m":"bad"  }'
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
{
    "error": "invalid_design_doc",
    "reason": "View m must be an object"
}