Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.1.4, 10.3.2.1, 10.3.3.0, 10.4.1.3, 10.4.2.0, 10.5.1.1, 10.5.2.0, 10.5.3.0, 10.6.1.0, 10.6.2.1, 10.7.1.1, 10.8.1.2, 10.8.2.2, 10.8.3.0, 10.9.1.0
-
Normal
-
Repro attached
-
Data corruption
Description
In contrast, ResultSet#updateBigDecimal on a FLOAT or DOUBLE column gives the expected error on underflow. Cf. the attached repro program MissingUnderflowCheck.
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
DERBY-5534 ResultSet#updateFloat, #updateDouble do not check for NaN and other conditions on client
- Open
-
DERBY-5533 Client differs from embedded when rs.updateInt overflows: 22015 vs 22003
- Closed