Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
GROOVY-8999, GROOVY-9093, GROOVY-9136, GROOVY-9195, GROOVY-9288, GROOVY-9292, GROOVY-9293, GROOVY-9695 and others cover various scenarios where read access to a field should or should not be allowed. One scenario that is yet uncovered is writing to a private or package-private field from a super class.
Consider the following:
package p class C { private /*or @PackageScope*/ Object field }
package q class D extends C { @groovy.transform.CompileStatic void test() { field = null // should be error } }
Also need static, closure and inner class variants.
I also think that @TypeChecked is not producing errors for any field access cases. Not sure if it is desirable to limit the checks to the SC path.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
GROOVY-6278 private super class members are not ignored
- Closed
- relates to
-
GROOVY-11356 STC: missing property error for implicit-this reference to private super field or method
- Resolved