Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
2.2.1
-
None
-
Reviewed
Description
On a heavily loaded cluster, WAL count keeps rising and we can get into a state where we are not rolling the logs off fast enough. In particular, there is this interesting state at the extreme where we pick a region to flush because 'Too many WALs' but the region is actually not online. As the WAL count rises, we keep picking a region-to-flush that is no longer on the server. This condition blocks our being able to clear WALs; eventually WALs climb into the hundreds and the RS goes zombie with a full Call queue that starts throwing CallQueueTooLargeExceptions (bad if this servers is the one carrying hbase:meta): i.e. clients fail to access the RegionServer.
One symptom is a fast spike in WAL count for the RS. A restart of the RS will break the bind.
Here is how it looks in the log:
# Here is region closing.... 2019-10-16 23:10:55,897 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.UnassignRegionHandler: Closed 8ee433ad59526778c53cc85ed3762d0b .... # Then soon after ... 2019-10-16 23:11:44,041 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.LogRoller: Failed to schedule flush of 8ee433ad59526778c53cc85ed3762d0b, because it is not online on us 2019-10-16 23:11:45,006 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.AbstractFSWAL: Too many WALs; count=45, max=32; forcing flush of 1 regions(s): 8ee433ad59526778c53cc85ed3762d0b ... # Later... 2019-10-16 23:20:25,427 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.AbstractFSWAL: Too many WALs; count=542, max=32; forcing flush of 1 regions(s): 8ee433ad59526778c53cc85ed3762d0b 2019-10-16 23:20:25,427 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.LogRoller: Failed to schedule flush of 8ee433ad59526778c53cc85ed3762d0b, because it is not online on us
I've seen this runaway WALs 2.2.1. I've seen runaway WALs in a 1.2.x version regularly that had HBASE-16721 fix in it, but can't say yet if it was for same reason as above.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
HBASE-23157 WAL unflushed seqId tracking may wrong when Durability.ASYNC_WAL is used
- Resolved
-
HBASE-16721 Concurrency issue in WAL unflushed seqId tracking
- Closed
-
HBASE-23221 Polish the WAL interface after HBASE-23181
- Resolved
- links to