Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
3.3.2
-
None
Description
At work we're getting build issues with Lang 3.3.2 (and any since 3.2 when the test code was introduced in LANG-818). The test org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDatePrinterTest.testCalendarTimezoneRespected picks a timezone and runs a test on it. One assumes that timezones usually work, but some are not - so it depends on the order of timezones returned by TimeZone.getAvailableIDs().
This would seem to imply a daylight savings time bug in FastDateFormat. This may be the same issue as LANG-916.
If you adjust the for loop such that the test is within the loop and happens on every timezone, you will hit timezones that fail. e.g.:
Index: FastDatePrinterTest.java =================================================================== --- FastDatePrinterTest.java (revision 1665715) +++ FastDatePrinterTest.java (working copy) @@ -269,8 +269,6 @@ for (final String zone : availableZones) { if (!zone.equals(currentZone.getID())) { anotherZone = TimeZone.getTimeZone(zone); - } - } assertNotNull("Cannot find another timezone", anotherZone); @@ -282,6 +280,8 @@ final String expectedValue = sdf.format(cal.getTime()); final String actualValue = FastDateFormat.getInstance(pattern).format(cal); assertEquals(expectedValue, actualValue); + } + } } @Test
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
LANG-916 CLONE - DateFormatUtils.format does not correctly change Calendar TimeZone in certain situations
- Closed