Uploaded image for project: 'PDFBox'
  1. PDFBox
  2. PDFBOX-1995

AdobePDFSchema.getProducer() returns empty string

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 1.8.4
    • 1.8.12, 2.0.0
    • XmpBox
    • None

    Description

      I experienced this bug while PDF/A validation process. The document is not considered valid because the producer value is not in sync with PDDocumentInformation.

      PDDocumentInformation.getProducer() = ` ' (one space)
      AdobePDFSchema.getProducer() = `' (empty)

      Below the metadata extracted from the PDF document:

      <?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
      <x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/">
      <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xap="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/">
      <xap:CreatorTool>Canon </xap:CreatorTool>
      <xap:CreateDate>2014-01-23T20:09:45+01:00</xap:CreateDate>
      </rdf:Description>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:pdf="http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/">
      <pdf:Producer> </pdf:Producer>
      </rdf:Description>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:pdfaid="http://www.aiim.org/pdfa/ns/id/">
      <pdfaid:part>1</pdfaid:part>
      <pdfaid:conformance>B</pdfaid:conformance>
      </rdf:Description>
      </rdf:RDF>
      </x:xmpmeta>
      <?xpacket end="w"?>

      As you can see the Producer value should be equal to ` ' (one space).

      The bug is located within the method DomXmpParser.removeComments. This method is invoked during the unmarshalling process and removes much more than comments, text nodes too!

      I can fix (badly) MY issue by changing the code base from :

      Text t = (Text) node;
      if (t.getTextContent().trim().length() == 0)

      Unknown macro: { // XXX is there a better way to remove useless Text ? node.getParentNode().removeChild(node); }

      into :

      Text t = (Text) node;
      if (t.getTextContent().startsWith("\n"))

      Unknown macro: { // XXX is there a better way to remove useless Text ? node.getParentNode().removeChild(node); }

      But this is not a long term fix.

      IMHO, the unmarshalling process should be reworked.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            gbm.bailleul Guillaume Bailleul
            AlexandreGarino Alexandre Garino
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: